Capitalism’s Commodification of Philosophy
In this giant IKEA store of a capitalist society nothing is more important to people than self-improvement and what is perceived as personal fulfillment. Individualist and existentialist ...
You can watch the narrated video here:
From Socrates to Camus, philosophers have sought not only to understand the world but to question it. Within that spectrum were some who believed in conformity and some who believed in the power of individualism - the latter being the subject of this article as it is commonly used to furnish even the most vile and antisocial philosophies with a nice catchy image. For now, let's just say that in our contemporary landscape, a general perceptible shift has occurred, one that has redefined the purpose and perception of philosophy.
In this giant IKEA store of a capitalist society nothing is more important to people than self-improvement and what is perceived as personal fulfillment. Individualist and existentialist philosophical concepts end up coming in handy, to rationalize the validity of often dehumanizing philosophical practices and concepts. It is my claim that - while some people consciously abuse and violate philosohical concepts - most of the time it comes down to advertising having brainwashed people to a point of compulsively distracting oneself from the present by focusing on the future.
Philosophical inquiry has been repurposed and rebranded and philosophical ideas have been packaged into easily digestible, self-help ideologies, replete with promises of unlocking the secrets to a better, fruitful life and the pursuit of mindless happiness. This transformation, while ostensibly democratizing philosophical thought, has obscured its original intent.
To comprehend the extent of the commodification of philosophy, let's first revisit the origins of some rebranded philosophical concepts and their intended purpose.
The Übermensch
Friedrich Nietzsche, the herald of existential exploration, conceived the Übermensch as a transcendent individual who surpasses conventional moralities and societal norms. Originally, Nietzsche's Übermensch was a radical proposition—a call to transcend the confines of traditional values and embrace a self-fashioned, authentic existence. However, in the contemporary landscape, this concept has been recast as a blueprint for personal empowerment, urging individuals to harness their inner potential in pursuit of personal success and dominance.
The Unique One
Max Stirner, the iconoclastic figure of egoism, introduced the concept of the Unique One—a notion of radical individuality, unbounded by external constraints. Stirner's intent was to liberate individuals from the dogmas of society, encouraging them to forge their own path and unapologetically assert their desires. Regrettably, this idea has been appropriated as a doctrine of self-interest, often reduced to a call for unbridled selfishness, neglecting Stirner's deeper philosophical inquiries into the nature of the self.
The Stoic
Stoicism, an ancient philosophy championing virtue ethics and inner tranquility, emerged as a beacon of resilience and ethical living. Stoicism aimed to cultivate moral character and equanimity in the face of life's adversities. Yet, in our modern era, Stoicism has been distilled into a set of pragmatic life hacks, focusing predominantly on coping strategies and personal success, often overlooking its profound metaphysical and ethical underpinnings.
These seminal philosophical ideas, once provocations to challenge societal norms and delve into the fundamental nature of human existence, now find themselves repackaged as tools for personal advancement. The transition from inquiry to practical application may seem beneficial on the surface, yet it inadvertently eclipses the deeper purpose of philosophy.
Nietzsche's Übermensch and Self-Improvement
In Nietzsche's magnum opus, "Thus Spoke Zarathustra," the Übermensch emerges as a transcendent ideal—a figure beyond conventional morality, liberated from the shackles of societal norms. Nietzsche's Übermensch was a call to arms, urging individuals to abandon the comfort of inherited values and instead embrace a self-fashioned, authentic existence.
The Übermensch, in its original form, represented a radical proposition. It was an invitation to confront the void left by the collapse of traditional beliefs and construct new, personal frameworks for meaning. This concept was not meant to be a simplistic guide to personal empowerment and most certainly not to become a dropshipping millionaire but rather a philosophical crucible in which individuals could forge their own values and destinies.
Yet, in the commodified realm of self-improvement, Nietzsche's Übermensch has undergone a profound metamorphosis. Reduced to a toxic-Masculinity flaunting catchphrase, it now serves as a rallying cry for personal dominance, success, and unbridled ambition. The kind that leads to feelings of superiority rather than authenticity and self-ownership. The original profundity of Nietzsche's inquiry into the nature of human existence is often overshadowed by a superficial emphasis on achieving one's goals and asserting dominance over others.
This distortion not only diminishes the depth of Nietzsche's philosophical project but also sidelines the critical questions he raised about the nature of power, morality, and the human condition. By repackaging the Übermensch as a tool for personal gain, we risk losing sight of the profound existential queries that Nietzsche intended to provoke.
In this era of instant gratification and quick fixes, it is crucial to recognize that the Übermensch was never meant to be a shortcut to success or a formula for personal fulfillment. It was, and remains, an invitation to confront the abyss of existence, to grapple with the complexities of human nature, and to construct one's own values in the face of a seemingly indifferent universe.
Stirner's Unique One and the Quest for Authenticity
Max Stirner, a provocative figure in the landscape of philosophical thought, introduced the concept of the Unique One—a radical exploration of individuality and self-possession. For Stirner, the Unique One represented an entity free from the constraints of societal expectations and conventional norms.
Stirner's intent was clear: to liberate individuals from the dogmas that sought to define and confine them. His call was not for reckless selfishness, but for a fearless assertion of one's desires, beliefs, and aspirations. The Unique One, as Stirner envisioned it, was an embodiment of authenticity—a refusal to be subjugated by external authorities.
However, as with Nietzsche's Übermensch, Stirner's concept has undergone a transformation in the contemporary milieu. The idea of the Unique One has been co-opted and reduced to a doctrine of self-interest, often interpreted as an endorsement of unbridled selfishness. This oversimplification neglects the deeper philosophical inquiries that Stirner pursued regarding the nature of the self and its relationship to society.
In relegating Stirner's Unique One to a mere advocacy of individualistic pursuits, we risk overlooking the profound implications of his work. Stirner's exploration was not confined to the realm of personal gain, but rather extended to a radical reevaluation of power dynamics, authority structures, and the very essence of human existence. This includes critically assessing capitalism as an oppressive framework for material existence.
By embracing a one-dimensional interpretation of the Unique One, we inadvertently dilute the philosophical potency of Stirner's inquiries. We negate the imperative to critically examine our relationship with societal constructs, and we overlook the potential for authentic self-expression and self-ownership.
Stoicism: From Virtue Ethics to Life Hacks
Stoicism, an ancient philosophy originating in the Hellenistic period, emerged as a profound system of thought aimed at cultivating moral character and inner tranquility. Rooted in a deep understanding of human nature, Stoicism provided a framework for navigating life's challenges with equanimity and ethical integrity.
Central to Stoic philosophy was the notion of virtue ethics—the belief that true fulfillment arises from the cultivation of virtues such as wisdom, courage, justice, and self-discipline. The Stoics emphasized the importance of living in accordance with these virtues, regardless of external circumstances. This approach was not merely a guide for personal success, but a call to embody a life of moral excellence.
However, in the contemporary landscape, Stoicism has undergone a significant transformation. The rich tapestry of virtue ethics has been reduced to a series of pragmatic life hacks and coping mechanisms. It is now often presented as a toolbox for achieving personal success, resilience, and emotional well-being, while its deeper metaphysical and ethical underpinnings are overlooked.
This reduction of Stoicism to a set of practical tools can have profound implications. While the modern application of Stoic principles may provide valuable strategies for navigating the complexities of daily life, it risks overshadowing the philosophy's original intent. The Stoic pursuit of virtue was never intended as a means to an end, but as a way of life—a constant, unwavering commitment to ethical living and the cultivation of moral character.
By commodifying Stoicism into a collection of life hacks, we run the risk of missing the profound philosophical insights it offers into the nature of human existence. The Stoic philosophy beckons us to grapple with the fundamental questions of what it means to lead a virtuous life, and how we should navigate the complexities of our shared human experience.
In reevaluating the place of Stoicism in the modern world, it is crucial to acknowledge its enduring relevance beyond the realm of practical advice. Only by delving into the depths of its original philosophical intent can we fully appreciate the profound wisdom that Stoicism imparts, not as a collection of quick fixes, but as a timeless guide to living a life of virtue and ethical integrity.
The Philosophical Detour: From Truth to Coping Mechanism
The detour from philosophical inquiry to utility raises critical questions about the essence of philosophy itself. This commodification may inadvertently discourage genuine intellectual engagement. When philosophical ideas are presented as neatly packaged self-improvement ideologies, there is a tendency to prioritize convenience and simplicity over the nuanced exploration of complex concepts. The inherent richness and depth of philosophical discourse can be sacrificed on the altar of accessibility.
But can you blame people? I mean, this world is exhausting. It's just loads and loads of overstimulations for a quick dopamine fix that help us choose coffee over suicide in the morning.
It's almost too painful to consciously exist.
Capitalism's Role: Commodity Culture and Philosophical Dilution
To understand the commodification of philosophy and its alignment with capitalist interests, we turn to the insightful framework presented by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari in "A Thousand Plateaus." In their seminal work, Deleuze and Guattari introduce the concept of the "rhizome," a complex, non-hierarchical network of interconnected ideas and influences. Through this lens, we can elucidate the ways in which capitalism has co-opted philosophical thought to further its own agenda.
The Rhizomatic Nature of Commodity Culture
Capitalism, as a socio-economic system, thrives on the perpetual creation and consumption of commodities. This cycle of production and exchange permeates all aspects of modern life, influencing not only our material goods but also our ideas and values. Deleuze and Guattari's concept of the rhizome provides a powerful metaphor for understanding the fluid, interconnected nature of this commodification process.
In this rhizomatic network, ideas are disseminated, adapted, and repackaged, often losing their original depth and complexity in the process. Philosophical concepts, once rooted in profound inquiry, are transformed into marketable commodities—packaged as self-help manuals, personal development programs, and lifestyle trends. The rhizomatic structure of commodity culture ensures that these simplified, easily digestible versions of philosophical thought proliferate and permeate our collective consciousness.
The Capitalist Co-Optation of Philosophy
Capitalism, as a system driven by profit and market expansion, inherently seeks to commodify all aspects of human life, including our intellectual pursuits. In this process, philosophy, with its capacity to provoke critical thought and challenge established norms, becomes a prime target for co-optation.
By repurposing philosophical concepts into easily marketable products, capitalism not only taps into a lucrative market for self-improvement and personal development but also reinforces its own ideological hegemony. The commodification of philosophy serves to pacify and placate, offering simplified solutions to complex existential questions, thereby diverting attention from systemic issues inherent to capitalist structures.
The Maintenance of Capitalist Hegemony
The commodification of philosophy aligns with capitalism's broader agenda of maintaining its own power and influence. By reducing profound philosophical ideas to consumable, easily digestible forms, capitalism diminishes the potential for genuine intellectual critique and radical thought.
This process also perpetuates a culture of passivity and conformity, discouraging individuals from engaging in deeper philosophical inquiry. Instead of challenging the status quo or questioning the underlying assumptions of capitalist ideology, individuals are encouraged to seek personal betterment within the existing framework, reinforcing the stability and longevity of the capitalist system.
Reclaiming the Radical Potential of Philosophy
In recognizing the co-optation of philosophy by capitalism, it becomes imperative to reclaim its radical potential. By resisting the reduction of philosophical thought to mere commodities, we assert the enduring importance of asking profound questions about existence, power, and societal structures.
Through a critical engagement with Deleuze and Guattari's concept of the rhizome, we can unveil the intricate connections between capitalist interests and the commodification of philosophy. By dismantling the simplified narratives and self-help ideologies, we pave the way for a resurgence of genuine philosophical inquiry—one that transcends the confines of capitalism and reclaims the discipline's true transformative power.